Caciocode

I know that time is only a human imagination/illusion and the idea of time or past and present is influenced by the human’s memory and his/her ability to record experienced events thus when remembering  his able to create the idea of how long an event has occurred or age of these events, remembering them in order.

There is a saying we use very regularly “If only I could go back in the past and change time”, so that the current/future can be different. But could someone really change the future by affecting the past? Consider this; suppose that there was a possible way to travel/go back in the past using whatever means, with a goal of making an affect on a past event so that the future outcomes of that event will be different, do you really think that if he/she was successful the future would change? When we think about time, we get this imagination/idea that time works in a single direction. To understand what I mean by single direction is to think of it as a rope that is without branches or a photographer who captures the world on his camera film or an event in a sequence, and then decides to organise them in their order on a piece of string continuous and gets the idea that changing some elements of a particular photo in the sequence will affect those after it. Do you get my idea? The photographer is proposing a fact that the changed event of the photo will not break from the time sequence but will affect the events that happened in the photos after it.

My idea is, what if the event of the changed photo does not affect the events of the photos after it as with our imagination of time, but the changed photo breaks from the sequence and creates another sequence of photo events starting from the changed photo. Putting this example into the idea of time, the future of the time sequence has not been changed and the future/current time that the time traveller left still exists unchanged after the time he has interfered with the past. Instead a new time has been created which has broken from a certain point of time from the time travellers past interference and heads in a different direction. Actually the interfered point in time will never affect any of the past before it. The past before the interfered past will never meet the interfered point in time, it will happen as if it had happened the time the time traveller never interfered with it, time will still take the same course not taking into account the time travellers interference. Do you get my idea? Time can never be changed but another time/sequence of events can be created from another point of time. So it’s like a photographer capturing a continuous sequence of events on his film and takes a single photo from that sequence and changes a particular element of it which in turn creates another completely different set of continuous events starting from the changed photo.

Instead of going back in time to change time, you would travel/jump into another point in another time or go back in the past and change direction into another time and go to the point of that other time or date which is equivalent to the current time that you wish to change. You activities haven’t changed time at all, but actually it’s the time traveller that has changed, I think this all idea gives fairness to time. It’s not wonder why in a film I saw once which adapted the idea of time very well a man travelled back multiple times in time to save his love from death only to return to find that she always died anyway, not realising that the only way to save her is to change himself in time and not the time.

So remember Gents and Ladies it is “If only I could change/transfer myself in time” or “if only I could go back and change direction in time”. That is if the idea that I have written is logical.

The future/current always remains certain it can’t just be trashed.

Does that make sense? What do you think?

No related posts.